Saturday, March 20, 2004

Zawahiri Pays For His Support Of John Kerry--Issues Threat Against Reporter

Somewhere Along The Pakistan/Afghanistan Border – Ayman al-Zawahiri, caught in a death struggle with Pakistani troops, called us on his satellite phone today and chastised for leaking the story about his clandestine support of Senator John Kerry for president.

“I spoke on deep background,” Zawahiri said. “Bush is a danger to our work so of course I like Kerry—but you shouldn’t have published my remarks. Now we have nothing but trouble. The next time I’ll talk with ”

Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf declined to comment on his awakening concerning the mental status of Sheik Osama bin Laden reported in the same article that the Zawahiri quotes appeared. But a REALLY high-level contact within the Pakistani government said, “bin Laden has higher positives in Pakistan and Jordan than Bush has in the United States,’ the contact explained. “Imagine the uproar the republicans would face if Bush tried to take out John McCain or Ted Kennedy—ok maybe Kennedy is a bad example—how about McCain and Tom Daschle? This is our problem—how do you take the mad Sheik and the Egyptian ghoul down without causing a revolt?”

Zawahiri said the ‘Egyptian ghoul’ remark was typical of the politics of personal destruction practiced by Musharraf, every person in the Bush administration and all the other apes and monkeys of the great Zionist conspiracy. “We’re still unhappy with you publishing our support for Kerry,” Zawahiri said.

“Of all the kufrs and infidels, I at least found you palatable,” Zawahiri said. “You’ve given us quite a bit of laughs during the past several months. The Sheik found your line about being ‘nuttier than Jessica Lange on a glue binge,’ especially hilarious although he felt the suggestion about the pigpen and pigs in Manhattan with the animal stimulate a bit over the top. He promises your death to be much more pleasant than that a@#%@#$ who writes AllahPundit”

Zawahiri’s conversation was constantly interrupted by the constant sounds of gunfire and heavy munitions. “Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and and Ashcroft are behind this,” Zawahiri shouted. “It’s the great Jewish and Christian conspiracy aided by the Bush re-election effort. If we’re able to get out of this one, I promise we have one of Kahn’s surprises we plan to deliver along Pennsylvania Avenue. Then we’ll deal with you”

Then the phone went dead.


Friday, March 19, 2004

Invasion--One Vote At A Time

Politicians, both democrat and republican, are allowing a foreign invasion to continue unabated.

None of the vote whores on either side of the aisle seem willing to tackle the flood of illegal immigration that has already made African Americans lose their place as the largest minority and will cause white Americans to lose their place as the majority by 2050 according to data released this week.

Whether it is insane because it is so pathetic, or pathetic because it is so insane--we are watching politicians and educators and journalists continue to allow us to be illegally invaded and told there is nothing we can do against the onslaught.

We are a nation of idiots led by fools who cower before special interests who are sponsoring this invasion vote-by-vote. It doesn't matter who is in power, they will continue to bend for every last vote.

And the media and academia will sit by and give you thousands of reasons why this is inevitable, good and the playing out of globalization of our society and culture.

Don't get me wrong, controlled immigration is a good thing and our society is enriched by people immigrating here. I'm sure you have as many friends who came from other countries as i do.

But we are one of the few countries in the world who seem to think having a couple of million illegal immigrants a year showing up here and putting a drain on our services-- and having politicians and pressure groups lie about the cost both now and in the future of these illegals is somehow a good and justifiable thing.

After this election, it is time to hold politicians accountable for their support of insurgency by illegal immigration


Hypocrisy and Selfishness--Rumsfeld Tells All


What does that mean? The impetus for today's contribution is a Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld editorial piece for the New York Times. In response to a Korean reporter's question as to why young Koreans should travel halfway around the world to fight in Iraq, Mr. Rumsfeld replied:

As it happened, I had that day visited a Korean War memorial, which bears the names of every American soldier killed in the war. On it was the name of a close friend of mine from high school, a wrestling teammate, who was killed on the last day of the war. I said to the reporter: "It's a fair question. And it would have been fair for an American to ask, 50 years ago, `Why should young Americans go halfway around the world to be killed or wounded in Korea?' "

I don't know whether to be shocked at the sheer disingenuousness of this statement or to conclude that our Secretary of Defense and long time government groupie and hanger-on, Don Rumsfeld, is actually that ignorant. Had Rumsfeld been intending to convince Koreans that their safety and sovereignty depended upon victory in Iraq, he might have had a point. Americans went to Korea in 1950 for the same reason that we have sent armed forces all over the world in nearly every year since--to protect our own perceived self-interest--period.

Let's look at just one of the cherished myths of the typical American (on a par with Washington confessing about felling a cherry tree). The French should be grateful because Americans rushed to Europe in 1942 to save them from the horrible Nazis. Right? After all, we liberated the French? Pardon my language, but history quite clearly records that the USA did not at any point give the proverbial rat's ass for France. In fact, Old Glory stood silently by while Poland, Czechoslovakia, the Netherlands, and others fell to the Nazi war machine. In fact, we did very little to help our "dear friends", the British--who in 1941 were on the brink of being invaded by Germany. No. We did nothing. And then the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. Congress was, of course, galvanized, and immediately declared war on Japan. And Germany, too, right? Wrong. We STILL did not voluntarily go to the aid of our European friends. In a move that still seems a mystery, Germany declared war on the United States. Then, of course, we gleefullly leaped into the fray "to help the poor Britains and French". Typical Americans think that we sacrificed blood and treasure out of our kindness, goodwill, noble bearing, and love of our allies when, in simple point of fact, we entered the war in Europe only because we were forced to by a German declaration of war upon us. We fought WWII for the same reason we have fought in every other war--self interest.

What does this have to do with Iraq or Korea? In 1950 (and for 40 years thereafter), those who actually run the USA were absolutely paranoid about "Communism". Well, let's be fair, they were terrified of Socialists who nationalized large industrial concerns. Or, in other words, very wealthy people did not want populist regimes using armed forces to take away their vast wealth. So--"communism" had to be stopped. China--with the largest population of any nation on earth (even in 1950)--did exactly that. After chasing Chiang Kaishek and his supporters to what is now Taiwan, the armies of Chairman Mao divested the wealthy of China of their wealth. Under no circumstances could a popular movement to use force to take wealth away from the wealthy be permitted to spread. What if the people of the United States did the same thing!? Communism had to be stopped. In 1950 it had to be stopped at the 38th parallel. To that end, the USA fed over 33,000 men and women to the beast of war. And, not to explode another myth, we didn't win. We declared an armistice, stopped killing each other, and stationed thousands of troops on the border. That was 51 years ago and those troops are still there. By the way, if you privately ask Army strategists why we have 33,000 troops stationed in Korea today, they will tell you that they are they to provide sufficient reason for the US to go to war if North Korea/China invades South Korea. They are nearly all expected to die in the first hours of any such invasion. Pardon me, I digress.

On to Iraq and the neocons protestations of love of democracy and their gushing sympathy for the poor, oppressed Iraqi people... What unadulterated, nauseating tripe. This administration, like any other, democrat or republican, does not (to use the earlier phrase) give a rat's ass about the poor, downtrodden Iraqi people, just as FDR really did not care at all about the suffering of the Poles, the Czechs, the French, or the British. The election of 2004 may not, after all, turn out to be about honesty and integrity. But if it does (and I hope it does) the bunch of lying hypocrites now in office is in deep trouble. And Mr. Rumsfeld has once again shown us why. This administration--ESPECIALLY this administration--cares for the powerful, old money interests. If we are feeding more young Americans to the beast of war, you may rest assured that it is ultimately to protect the wealth and power of someone whose name you have likely never heard. It most assuredly is NOT about removing evil dictators who are mean to their people.

Why should young Koreans travel halfway around the world to fight in Iraq? Let's be honest, Mr. Rumsfeld. They shoudn't. South Korean citizens haves insufficient self-interest in the Iraqi political mess you have created to shed blood over it. And they most certainly do not need to run to the aid of the USA out of gratitude for the Korean Conflict. South Koreans were saved from the fate of North Koreans because they (luckily) happened to be somewhere that the selfish and powerful in the United States decided to protect. Had they been as unlucky as the Ugandans under Idi Amin or the Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda, our "democracy loving, dictator hating, compassionate conservative" administration would have stood by while Koreans were slaughtered by the millions.

Young Americans really should have asked, 50 years ago, why they should travel halfway around the world to be killed or wounded in Korea. They should have asked more carefully and paid more attention. They may have come to the same conclusion--socialism had to be stopped at the 38th parallel because it threatens the personal fortunes of wealthy families. But then, they might not have.

So now we are in Iraq... The lies, deceptions, half-truths, equivocations, and quibbling on the part of the Bush Administration make an impressive pile. Telling the real truth about any of it seems completely beyond them. And as for Don Rumsfeld himself, anyone who has not seen his stumble-bumbling performance on last Sunday's "Face the Nation" really needs to. This gang of plutocrats is so used to a combination of bald-face lying and complete lack of accountability that Rumsfeld actually denied that he or any member of the Bush Administration ever claimed that Iraq was an immediate threat. He was immediately bombarded by direct quotes--some his, some from other senior administration members--showing the obvious: he and all of his comrades said exactly that, and repeatedly.

If there is one characteristic of the members of the Bush Administration that will almost certainly bring them down, it is there apparently complete inability to understand the concept of accountability. The really wealthy are never accountable. Traffic tickets can be fixed, palms can be greased, indiscretions can be hushed up... After 50 years of casual lying and routine deception, the idea that you might actually be held accountable for something you said or did is completely foreign to them.

They will rely on the "typical American" to survive this year. They will rely on people's fear and a preference for shallow myths over truth. They will wave flags, show you the rubble of destroyed buildings, wear flight suits, and do everything possible to scare the crap out of you--while assuring you that the only way to go is to be the meanest SOB in the valley--that is to back the Administration. The obvious solution to the violence which comes from being (mostly unjustly) hated by millions of people is pre-emtpive warfare, taking the fight to the terrorists, and killing them first. All things which sensitive Republicans (who weep over the suffering of all who don't live in freedom and democracy) will do better than cowardly democrats.

So let's review a couple of other interesting facts about the USA and war. Generally speaking, the USA has fought four major "wars" in the past 100 years (we'll get to Gulf "War" One and the Iraq Invasion later). Also, generally speaking, the USA's 20th century war record is 2 wins, 1 loss, and a draw. The 2 wins? WWI and WWII. And to whom did the American people entrust the national leadership during these difficult times? And, bear in mind, that a loss in either of these wars would have meant the end of the USA. The answer? Woodrow Wilson and Franklink Delano Roosevelt. Democrats.

The Korean Conflict began under Harry Truman, a democrat. But ended in a draw--not a victory--under Dwight David Eisenhower, a Republican.

Next we come to Vietnam. After a slow escalation under Kennedy, and a rapid escalation under Johnson, we lost under Nixon--a Republican.

The other two "major" conflicts of the past 100 years involve Iraq and both occurred under Republican Bushes. Both, I contend, will be judged by history as disasters; the first for its stunning lack of vision and failure to achieve resolution of anything and the second as one of the greatest foreign policy errors in the history of the United States.

Yet, to return to Mr. Rumsfeld and clumsy hypocrisy, what we have now on the national political stage is a plutocratic oligarchy dedicated to the preservation and promotion of vast individual wealth, lying to the common man with every utterance. It doesn't take much to see it if you don't let them blind you with a flag and mythology. The United States, like every nation state, has always and still spends blood and treasure only to protect its own interests. Every time you hear Rumsfeld or Rice or Cheney or Wolfowitz or McClellan wax poetic about that "brutal dictator" and how mean he was to his poor, suffering people, you may rest assured that you are being fed a load of crap.

Grow up and reject this kind of bald-faced lying. Either admit you want to conquer all of the oil-producing countries because you like driving big SUVs and refuse to pay more that 39 cents a gallon for gas or support the removal of ALL brutal dictators. Gas will be $6 a gallon, there will be mandatory military service for all young people, your taxes will go way up, your rights will have to be curtailed, and you will find yourself in a nation at war for you entire life. But, we have to stop the obvious and stupid lying. The nausea is overwhelming.


Thursday, March 18, 2004

new love from our Islamist friends at

Here's a live talk for you to attend this weekend to get a better understanding of the Islam that gets taught outside (and unfortunately inside to a lesser degree) the United States. The link is at

The obligation of hating false religions.

This Saturday's LIVE talk on Paltalk will discuss one of the greatest forgotten obligations in Islaam - Hating false religions. Allaah (swt) orders the believers to hate all other religions, way of lives, creeds, doctrines and beliefs that contradict with Islaam, and one cannot be
Muslim without to declare animosity and hatred towards kufr, bid'ah, shirk and nifaaq (Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism, Democracy, Freedom etc.).

Date and time: 20th of March 2004, from 6pm to 7:30pm GMT
Room: LIVE - Hating false religions
Speaker: Abu Muwahhid

When are Americans going to wake up?

Tuesday, March 16, 2004

Let us pray by all means, and then pass the ammunition

By Barbara Amiel
Daily Telegraph (London)

Last Friday millions of Spaniards marched against terror and demanded vengeance for the atrocity in Madrid.

On Saturday, after the arrest of some Moroccans and Indians that pointed to an Islamist connection, some thousands marched in the streets once again. This time they were protesting against government policies that had allied Spain with America in the war in Iraq and, in their view, invited the terrible act of retribution.

Each of these rallies made for a news item in its own right. One can't blame the media for doing their work but perhaps commentators might have made the point that Spain has always had people opposed to the war just as most other countries have - including America.

You can always find some, even many, with the view that we should not provoke the Islamic world and anything we do to protect ourselves from it will be provocative. Appeasement is nothing new and its futility seems lost in one of those great fogs that befuddle human minds.

Perhaps it was Osama bin Laden behind the Madrid bombings, perhaps not. The tape in London claiming responsibility for al-Qa'eda has none of the rather high-flowing rhetoric he sometimes reaches.

But ever since the bomb explosion in Oklahoma City in 1995, it's been a mug's game trying to decide who is behind such monstrous attacks - until you know. The immediate betting on that 1995 atrocity, with 68 dead and more than 1,000 injured, was Islamic terrorists, which made perfect sense at the time.

But early sense was wrong. The Oklahoma bombing was the work of one Timothy McVeigh, a home-grown terrorist with a deep hatred of the federal government. He was a God fearin' white American boy, from a blue-collar Bruce Springsteen sort of place.

Take your pick of the usual - and unusual - suspects for Madrid. In France today, the authorities are confronted with the ACZ terrorists. They have threatened to blow up the high-speed trains in France unless they receive $5 million. Who are they? Blackmail doesn't look like the modus operandi of Eta or al-Qa'eda but the group blew up a portion of railway track just to prove they, too, mean business.

ACZ, Eta, Hezbollah and their many lookalikes have one thing in common. They all partake of the satanic nature of the terrorist culture. They inhabit a different moral universe from us. This is not the Satan of the Old Testament who under God's strict watch goes on earth to test the goodness of men.

This Satan is the revelation of the New Testament, a Satan that is evil incarnate, who can seize men's souls and turn them into his subordinates on earth.

"What are the causes (of the Madrid bombing)?" James Naughtie asked Spain's Foreign Minister Ana Palacio on the Today programme, as if it were a perfectly rational question. Showing admirable restraint, Palacio merely replied: "Terrorism cannot claim any cause." Naughtie might as well have asked what the causes of evil are. Perhaps next time.

Whether it is the IRA, Chechens in a Moscow theatre, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, the suicide bombers of Arafat's al Aqsa Martyrs, Hamas, Islamic Jihad or the now-defunct Irgun and Stern gangs, makes no difference. These groups deliberately target non-combatants, with the aim of killing and maiming them: they are terrorists.

A bus mistakenly bombed by Nato in Serbia is not the same as a bus deliberately blown up in Jerusalem or a Shining Path car bomb in Lima. Such actions are not the tragic collateral damage of war but murder and damnation, even if the BBC won't say so. What astonishes is that the terrorist war against the West has been going on for more than 35 years now, and still the majority of Western countries are in denial.

Like many things in life, these inhabitants of Beelzebub's universe exist on a continuum. All evil is not equal. Dante's Hell has different circles with different inhabitants and some are more damned than others. Some aspire to world domination, a bizarre notion that seems more suitable to a "red robot" blog site.

The Nazis and the Communists came out of that bottle but, as we now see, even their cultural assumptions were just a little less distant from ours than those of today's terrorists.
As distorted, evil, and inhuman as Hitler and Stalin were, even their followers had the occasional flash of light. SS Captain Wilm Hosenfeld knew two verities: music and his Church. Both led him to help the terrified Jewish pianist Wladyslaw Szpilman survive in the ruins of Warsaw.

In fact, certain moral notions such as loyalty, conscience, support of the downtrodden or the innocence of the young, were never entirely dead even in that part of Satan's empire. The Soviets tried not to harm children or old women. The Nazis rarely raped, at least in the West.

Such pinpricks in the darkness are missing from today's Satanists. No compunction mitigates or limits their murder. Only our actions on earth can stop them but their deeds are so transcendentally satanic that it genuinely leads to the invocation "deliver us from evil". One feels impelled to invoke the moral force of a deity against them.

Among terrorists, the Islamists represent the most formidable challenge. Theirs is a culture from another era - and not a good one. Danny Kaye, in his film of Franz Werfel's Jacobowsky and the Colonel gave us a benign view of such a clash when he told the inflexible, down-on-his-luck European nobleman that "you have the finest mind of the 12th century". Madrid is what happens when the worst minds of the darkest ages confront modern times.

It is possible that Spain would not have had the explosions at this time if it had stayed on the sidelines in the war against Saddam. Their innocent people, now dead or wounded, blinded and crippled, might have been spared till next month or next year as the acolytes of bin Laden concentrated first on the more visible allies of the Great Satan America.

Or not, for Islamists have a special issue with Spain. One should remember the words of bin Laden, who in October 2001 spoke of the "tragedy in Andalusia", a reference to the final ending of the great Muslim advance in the Iberian peninsula by the Moors.

By their own mad statements, the Islamists will not be content until all the lands they believe belong to the Muslim world are free of the infidel and the "humiliation of 80 years ago" is reversed, meaning the reversal of the end of the Ottoman Empire.

Given their rather bloody interpretation of the command of the Koran to spread the word to all infidels, unless we pull ourselves together we shall find ourselves spread all over streets and railway lines. In the fight against Satan, it is traditional to have a deity onside. Let's pray by all means - and then pass the ammunition.


Monday, March 15, 2004

Politics is a Contact Sport

Eight More Months of Whine

The big guns started booming this past week—and the new JFK doesn’t like the noise. The “definition phase,” has begun and the senator finds himself in a defensive posture eight months away from his fateful Tuesday.

As I predicted in an earlier rant (see Kerry and the Chimpanzees), the awful screeching and bawling from the Kerry campaign has started and their strategy remains to deny everything that has transpired in his life since leaving Vietnam and to whine about the republican “attack machine.”

You can look forward to eight more months of whining from the new JFK, and his buddy, the butcher of Chappaquiddick. It was fun during the primary when the democrat’s cheap lies and slanders were sucked up by the news organizations like a flock of seagulls into a jet intake and every sound bite had wooden John mumbling: Bring It On.

But that is all changed now and the new JFK’s proposed policies are being picked apart by even hopelessly left-leaning papers like the New York Times or Washington Post.

John, the biggest problem for you is that your life didn’t end as a hero in Vietnam. You have a long, easily googled record that you will get tired of defending in the next eight months. Your extremely liberal voting record. Your post-Vietnam anti-war activities. Your anti-military, anti-intelligence votes and positions. Your desire to bring us another entitlement program with your very socialistic and very expensive health care program. Your promise to repeal the Bush tax cuts. Your desire to stop the war on terror.

Politics is a contact sport
And now you will learn something any fifth grader in Texas knows: Politics is a contact sport. Now you’re on the field with the big boys and girls and so far, you sound more like Jimmy Carter than James Carville. More like Terrell Owens than Ray Lewis.

It isn’t as much fun as you though it was going to be, n’est pas?

You must be encouraged by the election results from Spain—by all exit poll accounts al Qaida managed to terrorize an entire country and influence an election. These are your friends John, the ones who buckle under to nutty Islamists who have seen Spain as a Muslim country and act as if the liberation of Andalusia (as they still call it) happened yesterday.

You and your European friends will enjoy the inevitable attacks in France, Great Britain and here in the United States this year. Predictable Kerry campaign response—it was the war in Iraq.

Wrong again. Al Qaida’s purported communiqué (which is still suspect, although most are sure they did the Madrid bombings) actually pointed out us kicking their happy group out of Afghanistan.

Let me help you John—whether you like it or not we are in a war with terrorists who have declared war on us and plan to either destroy us or force us to convert to Islam. You and your liberal elite buddies might not comprehend this—but President Bush does.

Unfortunately, we are going to be reminded of this fact very soon as the people of Spain were last week.

And when that happens, the new JFK’s chances of moving into the White House will end.


Sunday, March 14, 2004

For those like Kerry who think there is no terrorist threat

Here's the point of view from our friends at You may find this quite mad ... but there are a growing number of Islamists who actually believe it. The front page of the site actually has the Capitol in flames.


Many of the Almighty signs of Allah (swt) were witnessed by the people of the world on 9/11. Many of the ayat of the Qur'an were demonstrated in our life in a very spectacular way, crystal clear for all to see. In fact, since that towering day in history we see an acceleration in the already large number of people becoming Muslim day after day - one of many of the benefits and positive outcomes from 9/11, Verily it is evident that Allah (swt) guides whoever He wishes despite the extreme measures of propaganda and misinformation from the kuffar to fight against the spread of Islam. The following are a few of these Almighty Signs of Allah (swt) in relation to 9/11.


USA was not expecting to be attacked by a small portion of people, he was expecting to be hit by a nation state; however Allah (swt) says:
"How many small portions of people; with Allah's will defeat a large power?…" [EMQ 2: 249]

This was a very small number with no heavy weaponry, no jets, no tanks, no cannons, no bombers, only 19 men with knives, and they defeated them heavily. For all their boasts of civilization and high technology, they had no defense against them.

People claim that it is not a victory because 'innocent' civilians were killed, yet the US army have killed many civilians, and furthermore, Allah (swt) is the one who decides who is innocent or not, and Allah (swt) says that the Muslims are innocent, not the kuffar.

Further victory, is that from this one incident, America reviewed its entire plans and policies.

They claim that it was committed out of nationalism or racism rather than for the sake of Allah (swt), yet we find that the 19 mujahideen came from 4 different countries, they had no nationalism or tribalism between them, they were united only by Islam, Muhammad Atta was from Egypt, Jarrah from Lebanon, others from Saudi Arabia, there was no nationalistic bond between them at all.

They did not go there only because of the US foreign policy, it was not reactionary. If the motive was the US foreign policy, then that would mean that if they reviewed their foreign policy - then the jihad would stop. However, what if the motive was not that but it was because they were devoted Muslims that believed that those kuffar should be killed? What if the reason was that Muslims are in captivity in America? There are many Muslims including Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman who are imprisoned in USA. It is well known that to release Muslims from the captivity of the kuffar is one of the reasons that will necessitate (oblige) Offensive Jihad.

In the past, entire tribes and cities and nations were conquered because of one Muslim captive, in the time of Muhammad (saw), Banu Qaynuqa was expelled because they simply insulted one Muslim Woman.

The Muslims never feel down, even when faced with calamity, the Muslims are grateful to Allah (swt) and say 'Alhamdulillah' looking to what other blessings Allah (swt) left him, he will never reject or say "O Allah, what did I do to deserve this?" - that is the sign of the kafir, Munafiq.


Allah (swt) informed us about the jews, they built a large fence to defend themselves, and were arrogant:
"They thought their defenses could save them from Allah, Allah will attack them from all directions… and he strikes fear in their heart." [Hashr - 59: 2-4]

America also believes to be safe from all eventualities, because they have no neighbors to fear from, they have continental missiles, they have fighter jets, they have tanks, they have every defense and thought they had prepared for any attack. However they never thought that the 19 Mujahideen could do what they did.

Furthermore, after 9/11, they changed their plans completely, they started to condemn and attempt to distort Tawheed, Walaa wal Baraa', Da'wah and Jihad, they declared that the real enemy is the Muslims and Islam.


Allah (swt) says:
"You did not throw when you threw, it was Allah who threw, you did not kill when you killed, it was Allah (swt) who killed." [Anfal: 17-18]

The US had calculated for planes crashing into the World Trade Centre and built it not to be affected, and yet it was completely destroyed, furthermore the building should not have fallen in the neat way that it did, and there should not have been other buildings falling with them without to get hit - as did occur on 9/11. It was none but Allah (swt) that brought down the World Trade Centre.

Allah ordered us to do the effort, and the result comes from Allah, It does not come from us nor from our own actions.

Another victory from 911 is that the American deficit rocketed down, the USA faced many other calamities from 9/11, Furthermore, many people became Muslim because of 9/11 at least 4 times more than before 9/11, that is a victory for Islam and Muslims.

USA always attacked the Muslims in our own homeland, they always saw themselves as the attackers, and the Muslims as the defensive victims, however after 9/11 they saw the Muslims as the attackers.


Allah (swt) says:
"Among the people are those who trade his life for the sake of Allah." [EMQ 2: 207]

After 9/11, we saw someone sacrifice everything for the sake of Allah, his presidency, his land, his country, his position, his wealth, all to protect one Muslim from the Kuffar.

The kuffar offered him financial support, offered him international recognition, they offered him everything in exchange for Sheikh Usama bin Laden, and he told them to go to hell. Even on the run, they offered Mullah Omar more and more and yet he still rejected.


The kuffar were so terrified, they would never come down to fight them on the land, they continued to bomb the mountains of Afghanistan until a third of the US ammunition was used up in Afghanistan, and they spent over $68,000,000,000 in Afghanistan, they are so terrified only because of one oath made by an old man - Sheikh Usama bin Laden, in a mountain in Afghanistan.

Despite their arrogance and their boasts and all their weaponry and technology, they were brought to their knees in terror by 20 Muslims: an old man and 19 young men.


Allah (swt) says in the hadith Qudsi:
"If all the people gathered together to harm you, they will never harm you except what Allah (swt) has decreed, and if all the people gathered together to benefit you, they will never benefit you except for what Allah (swt) has decreed …" [Nawawis forty Hadith Qudsi]

| Home |


A Letter from a Special Forces Officer who served in Vietnam

The old hurts are surfacing and the feelings of betrayal by fellow
citizens, and their leader stirring them up, are breaking my heart again. I am being cut in
the same scar.

How did we who served in Vietnam suddenly become cold-blooded killers, torturers, and
rapists, of the ilk of the Nazi SS or the Taliban? Most of us were American soldiers who grew up idolizing John Wayne, Roy Rogers, and all the other heroes. That was why I volunteered.

But for political expediency, John Kerry has rewritten history, again. After spending only four months in the country of Vietnam, John Kerry testified before Congress in 1971 with these exact words about incidents he supposedly witnessed or heard about from other vets: "They personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam."

I was a Green Beret officer who volunteered for duty in Vietnam and fought in the thick of it in 1968 and 1969 on a Special Forces A-team on the Ho Chi Minh Trail, just for starters. We were the elite. We saw the most action. Everybody in the world knows that.

But we did not just kill people, we built a church, a school, treated illnesses, passed out soap,
food, and clothing, and had fun and loving interaction with the indigenous people of Vietnam, just like our boys did in Normandy, Baghdad, Saigon, and everywhere American soldiers ever served. We all gave away our candy bars and rations to kids. Our hearts to oppressed people all over the globe.

My children and grandchildren could read your words, and think
those horrendous things about me, Mr. Kerry. You are a bold-faced, unprincipled liar, and a
disgrace, and you have dishonored all my fellow Vietnam veterans and me. Sure, there were a couple bad-apples, but I saw none, and I saw it all, and if I did, as an army officer, it was my obligation to stop it, or at the very least report it. Why is there not a single record anywhere of you ever reporting any incidents like this or having the perpetrators arrested?

The answer is simple. You are a liar. Your medals and mine are not a free pass for lifetime, Senator Kerry, to bypass character, integrity, and morality. I earn my green beret over and over daily in all aspects of my life.

Eight National Guard green berets, and other National Guard
soldiers, have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and you totally dishonored their widows and
families by lumping National Guard service in with being a draft-dodger, conscientious objector, and deserter, just so you can try to sabotage the patriotism of our President who proudly served as an Air National Guard jet pilot. I have a son earning his green beret at Fort Bragg right now, and his wife serves honorably in the Air National Guard, just like President Bush did, and I am as proud of her as I am my son.

I volunteered for Vietnam and have no problem whatsoever with President Bush
being our Commander-In-Chief. In fact, I am proud of him as our leader.

> John Kerry, you personally derailed the Vietnam Human Rights
Bill, HR2883, in 2001, after it had passed the House by a 411 to 1 vote, and thousands of
pro-American Montagnard tribes people in Vietnam died since then who could have been saved, by you.

Earlier, as Chair of the Senate Select Committee on MIA/POW Affairs, you personally quashed the efforts of any and all veterans to report sightings of living POW's, when you held those reins in Congress. You have fought tooth and nail to push for the US to normalize relations with Vietnam for years.

Why, Mr. Kerry?

Simple, your first cousin C. Stewart Forbes, CEO, of Colliers
International, recently signed a contract with Hanoi, worth BILLIONS of dollars for Collier's
International to become the exclusive real estate representative for the country of Vietnam.

"Hanoi John," now that it works for you, you beat your chest
about your Vietnam service, but to me, you are a phony, opportunistic, hypocrite. You are one
of those politicians that are like a fertilizer machine: all that comes out of you is horse
manure, and you are spreading it everywhere.

Medals do not make a man. Morals do.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?